Concentration and Death Camps Chart

From 1933 to 1945, the Nazis ran camps within Germany and Poland to remove political dissidents and anyone they considered Untermenschen (subhuman) from society. A few of these camps, known as death or extermination camps, were specifically built to kill large numbers of people quickly. What Was the First Camp? The first of these camps was Dachau, built in  1933, just months after Adolf Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany. Auschwitz, on the other hand, was not built until 1940, but it soon became the largest of all the camps and was both a concentration and a death camp. Majdanek was also large and it too was both a concentration and death camp. As part of Aktion Reinhard, three more death camps were created in 1942  -- Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka. The purpose of these camps was to kill all the Jews remaining in the area known as the Generalgouvernement (part of occupied Poland). When Did the Camps Close? Some of these camps were liquidated by the Nazis starting in 1944. Others continued to operate until either Russian or American troops liberated them.   A Chart of Concentration and Death Camps Camp Function Location Est. Evacuated Liberated Est. No. Murdered Auschwitz Concentration/Extermination Oswiecim, Poland (near Krakow) May 26, 1940 Jan. 18, 1945 Jan. 27, 1945by Soviets 1,100,000 Belzec Extermination Belzec, Poland March 17, 1942 Liquidated by NazisDecember 1942 600,000 Bergen-Belsen Detention;Concentration (After 3/44) near Hanover, Germany April 1943 April 15, 1945 by British 35,000 Buchenwald Concentration Buchenwald, Germany (near Weimar) July 16, 1937 April 6, 1945 April 11, 1945Self-Liberated; April 11, 1945by Americans Chelmno Extermination Chelmno, Poland Dec. 7, 1941;June 23, 1944 Closed March 1943 (but reopened);Liquidated by NazisJuly 1944 320,000 Dachau Concentration Dachau, Germany (near Munich) March 22, 1933 April 26, 1945 April 29, 1945by Americans 32,000 Dora/Mittelbau Sub-camp of Buchenwald;Concentration (After 10/44) near Nordhausen, Germany Aug. 27, 1943 April 1, 1945 April 9, 1945 by Americans Drancy Assembly/Detention Drancy, France (suburb of Paris) August 1941 Aug. 17, 1944by Allied Forces Flossenbrg Concentration Flossenbrg, Germany (near Nuremberg) May 3, 1938 April 20, 1945 April 23, 1945 by Americans Gross-Rosen Sub-camp of Sachsenhausen;Concentration (After 5/41) near Wroclaw, Poland August 1940 Feb. 13, 1945 May 8, 1945 by Soviets 40,000 Janowska Concentration/Extermination Lviv, Ukraine Sept. 1941 Liquidated by NazisNovember 1943 Kaiserwald/Riga Concentration (After 3/43) Meza-Park, Latvia (near Riga) 1942 July 1944 Koldichevo Concentration Baranovichi, Belarus Summer 1942 22,000 Majdanek Concentration/Extermination Lublin, Poland Feb. 16, 1943 July 1944 July 22, 1944by Soviets 360,000 Mauthausen Concentration Mauthausen, Austria (near Linz) Aug. 8, 1938 May 5, 1945by Americans 120,000 Natzweiler/Struthof Concentration Natzweiler, France (near Strasbourg) May 1, 1941 Sept. 1944 12,000 Neuengamme Sub-camp of Sachsenhausen;Concentration (After 6/40) Hamburg, Germany Dec. 13, 1938 April 29, 1945 May 1945by British 56,000 Plaszow Concentration (After 1/44) Krakow, Poland Oct. 1942 Summer 1944 Jan. 15, 1945 by Soviets 8,000 Ravensbrck Concentration near Berlin, Germany May 15, 1939 April 23, 1945 April 30, 1945by Soviets Sachsenhausen Concentration Berlin, Germany July 1936 March 1945 April 27, 1945by Soviets Sered Concentration Sered, Slovakia (near Bratislava) 1941/42 April 1, 1945by Soviets Sobibor Extermination Sobibor, Poland (near Lublin) March 1942 Revolt on October 14, 1943; Liquidated by Nazis October 1943 Summer 1944by Soviets 250,000 Stutthof Concentration (After 1/42) near Danzig, Poland Sept. 2, 1939 Jan. 25, 1945 May 9, 1945by Soviets 65,000 Theresienstadt Concentration Terezin, Czech Republic (near Prague) Nov. 24, 1941 Handed over to Red Cross May 3, 1945 May 8, 1945by Soviets 33,000 Treblinka Extermination Treblinka, Poland (near Warsaw) July 23, 1942 Revolt on April 2, 1943; Liquidated by Nazis April 1943 Vaivara Concentration/Transit Estonia Sept. 1943 Closed June 28, 1944 Westerbork Transit Westerbork, Netherlands Oct. 1939 April 12, 1945 camp handed over to Kurt Schlesinger

The People versus Tyronne Johnson - 1116 Words

The Assistant District Attorney, Queens County, New York, Claude Stuart was the lead prosecutor in a murder case, titled, People v. Tyronne Johnson. Johnson was tried for the murder of Leroy Vann Tony. Johnson was convicted of murder and sentenced to the term of 20 years to life. After serving 13 years of the prison sentence, the conviction of the defendant was overturned. There was a determination that the prosecutor, Claude Stuart withheld evidence from the defense which was the reason the judgment was overturned. During the course of the trial, the defense counsel raised questions in reference to a police report containing witness information that could prove favorable for the defense. During the trial, the Justice, Honorable Jaime Rios questioned Assistant District Attorney Stuart regarding the witness location information from that police report. The Respondent replied that he made several attempts to contact the witness but was not successful. The respondent continued to deny his awareness of the location of that witness. Further investigation revealed that ADA Stuart had knowledge of the witness location in question due to the fact that he met the witness at her place of employment on a recent occasion. The Court determined that ADA Stuart’s response to the question asked by the Justice was false. Respondent did not correct the error at the trial. The Board of Professional Responsibility recommended and imposed a three year suspension for Claude Stuart as

Information technology and its effect on organisat Essay Example For Students

Information technology and its effect on organisat Essay ional structure Organizations are in the midst of transformation. In many industries, mass production by large, vertically integrated, hierarchically organized firms is giving way to more flexible forms of both internal organization and industrial structure. Work is increasingly accomplished through networks of smaller, more focused groups. The resulting structure of sub-organizations is redefining the boundaries of both firms and industries. A case in point is the computer industry. In the past, large, vertically integrated firms such as IBM dominated the industry, which created products and services throughout the value chain from the microprocessor level all the way up to the provision of solutions. The vertical structure is now being replaced by a series of layers, each of which is, in effect, a separate industry. Value is generated by coalitions, where each member of a coalition specializes in its area of core competence and enhances it through the use of tactical or strategic partnerships. Internally, team structures are replacing the traditional hierarchical form. Incentives are increasingly based on performance, and achievements. In sum, modern enterprise is undergoing major restructuring and information technology IT is an important driver of this transformation. A fundamental change is taking place in the nature and application of technology in business. This change has profound and far-reaching implications for organizations and for youthe information age is evolving into a second era. Organizations that do not make this transition will fail. They will become irrelevant or cease to exit. Information Technology: Technology is usually referred to as the production process of a society or an industry. But, with the advent of computers, such assumption is no longer valid. We are now living in a new era of Information, and a new definition is born: Information Technology which combines the processing power of computers and all hardware and software that accompanies it, enabling those components to retrieve, process, store and distribute information to support decision-making and control in an organization. With such tools individuals can access and share a wide variety of information Information technology transcends the knowledge base constraints of general technology and gives the user access to a theoretically limitless perceptual field . The effects of computers and its accompanying systems have therefore, the capability to change social as well as organizational structures. Organization Structure: The structure of an organization is seen as providing the framework, which turns a collection of people and resources into an identifiable form. Mintzberg places considerable emphasis on structure and his definition proposes it as the summation of the ways in which a firms labor is directed and coordinated into tasks There are generally several models of organizations. But the most commonly used are the mechanistic form, which portrays the organization as a machine, and organic which view the organization as an organism, which is a more flexible model. Since structure (mechanistic or organic provides a framework for all the components of an organization including technology, we can therefore find a relationship between structure and technology, and more specifically IT. At the turn of the century, Frederick Taylor sought to put the wisdom for successful business organization on a scientific basis. His work guided a generation of managers towards success in adapting their organizations with the technologies, markets, labor and general environment of the era. By the 1920s, Henry Ford had applied the Taylorist approach and soon dominated the automobile market, driving dozens of competitors under. Ironically, these same principles are opposed to the prevailing wisdom of the 1990s. For example, consider the following guideline from The Science of Management It is necessary in any activity to have a complete knowledge of what is to be done and to prepare instructions the laborer has only to follow instructions. .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 , .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .postImageUrl , .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 , .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:hover , .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:visited , .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:active { border:0!important; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:active , .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9 .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udd7a7648a64466528661eb4fa18425b9:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Same sex marriages Essay He need not stop to think. The current emphasis on empowerment, learning organizations, and even thriving on chaos stands in sharp contrast to the above advice. Similar contrast can be found with many, if not most, of the other principles that lead to success even as late as the 1960s. For example, there are growing calls for downsizing (vs. economies of scale), total quality (vs. cost leadership), project teams (vs. functional departments), networked organization (vs. clear firm boundaries); performance-based pay (vs. position .

Reforestation Essays (767 words) - Reforestation, Forest Management

Reforestation The purpose of this written report is to inform the reader about the concerns and facts involved with reforestation. Reforestation began in Ontario after World War II. What happened was, professional foresters were assigned to an area and became responsible for its well being. Under the Crown Timber Act, long term management was prepared. Then the many steps needed to rebuild a forest began. Included in this report will be information on the effects of cutting and replanting, such as Carbon Dioxide, and Global Warming. Following this will be methods for planning a forest, and how they are conveyed before planting in a forest begins. There are many reasons why forests are cut down. One is to benefit economically, with furniture and home building. But there is also another reason. Arguments say "the United States could help slow the atmospheric accumulation of carbon dioxide by replacing old-growth forests with faster-growing young trees". A new study of young and old forests says how this is in fact not true. Loggers have said that new trees pull the carbon dioxide better than old trees, and this may seem true, but it is not. There is one point being overlooked from all of this. The older, larger trees can store much, much more carbon dioxide than a new tree could. By cutting and burning these magnificent seasoned trees, the CO2 is being released back into the atmosphere. These releases of carbon dioxide add up in our surroundings, only to intensify Global Warming. Although this shows what happens when one burns and cuts down old forests, one must still plant new trees for long term plans, not letting them grow for a few years, to then cut them down. There are many methods for planning a forest. The simplest method of replanting a forest is to leave it to nature. A suitable seed bed in which trees will readily take root is integral for successful regeneration. Reducing competition by eliminating grass, weed or shrubs is another requirement in securing a new crop of trees. These will sprout to produce seedlings. Though the weeds were eliminated before, they still grow back, and because of this poor, quality trees will grow. Another method though, is to create a planned forest, where new conifers are grown from seed in a special nursery. Seeding is a reforestation technique used mainly in the Boreal forest area where fire or logging tends to leave no or very little seeds for growth. In specific cases, Ministry staff seed the area with treated tree seeds. Following this is the planting. In many cases, planting is the only means of initiating a new forest. Up to 80 000 000 trees are planted annually in Ontario on Crown and private land. Usually immature forests have to be tended to. Once situated, a new crop needs intermittent care for the next 60 to 100 years. This means continuing protection from fires, disease and insects and routine thinning to focus the growth on selected crop trees. Before a forest can be grown, certain procedures must first occur. Collecting and processing seeds is one of them. Tree flowers fertilized by blowing winds or insects generate seed, in a time of somewhere within 1 to 2 years. Seed collecting from the woods must be timed with periodically occurring good seed years. Angus, near Barrie, is where all forest tree seed collection is co-ordinated. Stock of seeds can value up to $500 000. Usually this is around 3 billion seeds from 59 tree classes. In summary of the aforesaid, trees are very valuable to the human race economically and for health. Without trees the environment could worsen to the point where we would be living on one large dessert. We must remember that forest do not grow as easily as they used to because of fires and other disasters. This is why many forests are planned, and cared for. Most of us will never now how they turn out because for a forest to completely grow, it needs within anywhere from 60 to 100 years or more. There are many reasons why we should have reforestation. One being mostly that we need forest to live! Without forests, or any type of plant, the carbon cycle can't result. There are not many arguments against reforestation, but there can be some opposition for the land being used between a large business company and the Ministry. I feel replanting of forests is very crucial to the human race. The earth depends on many cycles, where one organism depends on